February 27, 2023
February 27, 2023

The Science Behind Quantifying Agricultural Emissions

Gayathri Gopalakrishnan
Director of Environmental Science

At Regrow, we work diligently to make sustainable agriculture accessible on a global scale. That’s no small task. However, by utilizing industry-leading science and technology and working to progress that technology, we can make efficient progress and encourage positive impact across the agrifood industry.

Let’s assess the science we use to achieve our goals, and discuss how we work to expand our science for the future of the industry.

Understanding Sustainable Agriculture

Before diving into our scientific methods, it's important to understand how we use science to make agriculture sustainable globally. When we consider ‘sustainable agriculture,’ we typically assess the following factors: 

  1. GHG emissions: what types of greenhouse gasses are emitted, and in what quantity, as a result of food production? 
  2. Soil Carbon: how much existing carbon can we pull from the atmosphere and sequester in agricultural soil?
  3. Food resilience: how can our crops be strong and productive in the face of our changing climate?
  4. Ecosystem services: how can we minimize land use and maintain biodiversity with agriculture?
  5. Air quality: how can we ensure good air quality in our agricultural systems?
  6. Water quality: how can we ensure that our farming efforts don’t negatively affect the water in our environment?

Although we are working to improve all of these factors, at Regrow we are most focused on quantifying and reducing GHG emissions associated with food production, and increasing the potential for carbon sequestration in agricultural soil. It’s important to be able to accurately measure the current GHG emissions and carbon sequestration associated with agricultural systems (that is, how farming works across different regions, crops, and types of crop production) in order to help producers adopt more sustainable practices and reduce emissions. Without the data, how could anyone know whether those efforts are making a difference? We also need to be able to estimate or model future emissions based on the adoption of different regenerative farming practices.

“We are not only at the frontier of building new products, but we’re also at the frontier of scientific knowledge. We are both creating new knowledge, and we’re taking the existing knowledge we have, building new methods with it and scaling it.” — Gayathri Gopalakrishnan, Ph.D., Director of Environmental Science

At Regrow, we use an environmental model called DeNitrification DeComposition, or DNDC. DNDC takes data about emissions and carbon sequestration (how much carbon is stored in the soil) for agricultural systems, and uses that data to predict how emissions may change as producers adjust their farming practices.

Modeling a Complicated System

Agricultural systems are quite complicated, especially when it comes to predicting or measuring the GHG emissions associated with agricultural activity. Emissions levels vary on a field-by-field basis due to the crop produced, the composition of the soil in the field, weather conditions in a specific region, agricultural management practices, and many additional factors. 

Emissions factors are often calculated using generalized datasets, and quantify the carbon sequestered in soils with soil sampling. Both of these methods have challenges associated with them.

Generalized databases provide a good starting point for quantifying emissions, but these datasets don’t account for the variation between different farming systems in a given region. For example, they fail to address how emissions change if the same crop is grown in different counties within the same state, or in a different type of soil. In this instance, models are useful because they are dynamic — they build upon new datasets, are often more locally calibrated, and have the potential to expand in their estimation capabilities.

Soil sampling provides an  accurate account of the carbon stored in agricultural soils, but it’s an inefficient process. It’s time-intensive, expensive and difficult to scale. That’s where models come in: with the right model, we can predict the emissions and sequestration associated with crop production without spending too much time and money on soil sampling.

However, modeling complex agricultural systems is difficult. In order to build upon the DNDC model and ensure the most accurate outcomes possible, our team asks a series of questions: 

  1. What are the processes governing these systems that we know about? Can we write equations that represent these processes?
  2. What data are needed for these processes? Can we collect the data? If so, how accurate is the data? 
  3. What results can we get from this data? Are the results reproducible? Can we compare them against observed data, such as soil samples and satellite data? 

Our soil nutrient cycling model, DNDC, has stored data from numerous agricultural systems, and is using that data to predict emissions and sequestration levels for crop production. However, our team is always working to enhance this model, and to expand DNDC’s capabilities through the input and analysis of new data.

As an example, here’s a simplified diagram of the calculation factors in the DNDC model: 

Graphic: DNDC model calculation factors

Each of the components in the map above has an equation assigned to it, based on data collected in the field or laboratory. Each component requires a number of parameters and equations to ensure that we’re calculating our emissions and sequestration estimates correctly. 

Considerations in Environmental Modeling

As we work to expand DNDC and incorporate this environmental model into Regrow’s products, our team is constantly testing the validity of the model and the data behind it. In expanding DNDC, we always consider the following factors:

  1. Where our data comes from (In-field measurements, remote sensing algorithms, like OpTIS, farm management systems (FMS), government databases such as the National Weather Service and the Natural Resources Conservation Service, etc.)
  2. What assumptions we will need to make, if data is not available
  3. What impact our assumptions will have on the accuracy and reliability of our model

These considerations guide the progress of the environmental model behind our products. They also ensure that we expand our knowledge and capabilities in an ethical, scientifically rigorous way, and that the estimates produced by our model will contribute to a healthier, greener planet.

The Scientific Process at Work

The scientific process is essential to our work at Regrow. Our teams are constantly working to run our model, test its predicted outcomes against field observation data, and get the best results possible. Once we’ve filled the gaps in our knowledge, it’s time to find new gaps, access new data and scale our work.

This is an ongoing process not only with our soil nutrient cycling model, but also with our monitoring technology and the products we deliver to our customers. Careful research and scientific rigor are at the heart of our mission: to make sustainable agriculture accessible on a global scale.

See why measuring soil carbon is difficult, and learn why investing in soil carbon estimation is essential for the future of our food systems.

Continue reading:

March 27, 2023

Tony Tricozzi Joins Regrow Ag as Head of Strategic Partnerships

Regrow Ag is excited to welcome Tony Tricozzi as our new Head of Strategic Partnerships.

April 20, 2021

AgTech Startups Navigating Changing Markets, Growth & Acquisitions

Anastasia Volkova Featured on Venture Cafe’s The Yield Lab


Keep up with Regrow!

There is always a lot going on at Regrow and you are not going to want to miss a thing.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.