No items found.

5 LSRS questions that aren’t settled yet

LSRS is final, and the real work of implementation is beginning. LSRS clears a pathway for higher-integrity land sector accounting, and companies are preparing for alignment. We’re tracking a few open questions that will shape how companies implement LSRS in practice.

Here’s what we’re watching:

Will soil sampling be required for every project area, or will calibrated models suffice?

The standard states that companies should calibrate model-based and remote sensing approaches using empirical data specific to the land area, management practices, and GHG impacts under analysis. A key open question is whether this requirement inherently implies project-area soil sampling, or whether calibrated model-based approaches supported by other empirical datasets will be sufficient. The answer will have significant implications for scalability and cost of implementation. Further clarification is expected as LSRS guidance evolves through 2026.

How will uncertainty need to be quantified and reported in practice?

The final LSRS softens language around uncertainty compared to earlier drafts. We’re watching for guidance on whether uncertainty must be explicitly incorporated into models, and how confidence intervals should be calculated in practice.

Will intervention accounting outcomes be accepted by target-setting bodies?

LSRS introduces a formal pathway for impact traceability when physical traceability isn’t yet available. It’s still unclear how these outcomes will be treated by target-setting bodies, making this an important transitional tool rather than a final destination.

How should carbon stock changes be allocated across crop rotations in annual reporting?

The standard recommends allocating carbon stock changes across entire crop rotations, but how that reconciles with annual reporting is still unresolved.

How will monitoring, reversals, and buffer pools be managed efficiently across large programs?

Monitoring, reversals, and buffer pools are now core requirements. We’re focused on how these can be managed efficiently, especially across supply sheds and multi-buyer programs.

LSRS is a meaningful step forward. The companies that succeed will be those designing programs that are traceable, durable, and adaptable as guidance continues to evolve.

At Regrow, we’re actively engaging with standard setters, assurance providers, and customers to ensure today’s programs are built to hold up tomorrow. Keep an eye on our channels, where we’ll update you as things evolve.

Are you ready for LSRS alignment? Get your checklist here.

Looking for a deep dive?

Get the 101 on Agriculture Resilience and see what it could mean for the future of our industry — and our planet.

Learn more